Bug 158652
| Summary: | camstream fails to rebuild on ppc | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> | ||||||
| Component: | camstream | Assignee: | Orphan Owner <extras-orphan> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | byte | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Patch | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2006-02-26 07:54:36 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 157183 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Jeremy Katz
2005-05-24 15:49:33 UTC
Turns out this is in relation to asm issues in camstream (that are x86 specific). Looking at video_asm.S to fix would be necessary. Attaching a full build failure Created attachment 114786 [details]
full build log for ppc failure
Now, going by precedent, till we get a nice PPC patch, we should do what others do (in this case, gentoo - http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?camstream-0.26.3). Attached diff is a patch that can be applied, provided owner is happy... Created attachment 114789 [details]
spec file patch to make it -ppc
That sounds sane to me. Colin, feel free to commit and queue the build (preferably also referencing a bug # left open about the need to port the asm to ppc) Okay, built on x86/x86_64, excluded PPC for now. Maintainer, are you around? #157509 in question... |