Bug 1595535
Summary: | In a 4 node CNS cluster, need to pass 3 hosts from heketi for gluster-block cli when HA is 3, instead of all 4 IPs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Neha Berry <nberry> |
Component: | heketi | Assignee: | Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Neha Berry <nberry> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | cns-3.10 | CC: | akrishna, hchiramm, jmulligan, kramdoss, prasanna.kalever, rhs-bugs, rtalur, sankarshan, storage-qa-internal, xiubli |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | CNS 3.10 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Previously, because of an off by one error, Heketi added one host more than ha count to the list of hosts provided to gluster-block cli during block volume create. This lead to the incorrect usage of one extra node. With this fix, the number of hosts used for iscsi targets is equal to ha count parameter.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-09-12 09:23:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1568862 |
Comment 6
Raghavendra Talur
2018-07-09 12:49:21 UTC
From heketi code, gluster-block create %v/%v ha %v auth %v prealloc full %v %vGiB --json So, heketi sends only as many hosts as in ha count. Is it possible that gluster-block creates target on 4th node as it belongs to the same trusted storage pool? This is a bug in heketi and I have a patch ready. Providing acks. Patch posted at https://github.com/heketi/heketi/pull/1256 Fixed in version : rhgs-volmanager-rhel7:3.3.1-20 Updated doc text in the Doc Text field. Please review for technical accuracy. Thankyou John I have updated the doc text based on the feed back. Doc Text looks OK Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:2686 |