Bug 160123

Summary:	Reconcile our two versions of check_all.js
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Network	Reporter:	David Lutterkort <lutter>
Component:	RHN/Web Site	Assignee:	Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fanny Augustin <fmoquete>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rhn400	CC:	hbrock, rhn-bugs
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHN 4.0.0	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-09-01 02:25:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	157427

Description David Lutterkort 2005-06-10 22:42:21 UTC

My post to rhn-webdev-list and ensuing discussion
(http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhn-webdev-list/2005-June/msg00974.html):

I am looking into a bug that seems to be related to check_all.js. The
first thing I noticed is that we have two copies of it in svn:

svn/eng/java/code/webapp/javascript/check_all.js
svn/eng/web/html/javascript/check_all.js

Only the second one seems to be used on a satellite. Unfortunately, the
two files differ; what is the story behind these two files ? Can I just
delete the one in the java tree ? Does anything need to be merged from
the java/ one into hte web/ one ?

Comment 1 Bret McMillan 2005-06-16 15:51:28 UTC

I think this originally came from rnorwood, but cturner & possible mbowman might
have more data.

And there's always 'svn blame' :)

If there are perl issues as well, file as sub-bugs and we can farm those out to
folks familiar w/ the perl codebase.

Comment 2 David Lutterkort 2005-06-22 19:44:25 UTC

Robin, I think you took care of this already, right ? If not, feel free to
reassign to me with a comment on what still needs to be done.

Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2005-07-14 20:18:19 UTC

On to 'ON_QA'.

Test plan:

This is basically an internal svn/cvs issue, not really any QA to do.  But you
can make sure javascript 'works', ie:

o Use the 'check all on page' checkbox at the top of a list with checkboxes'.
o Use the checkboxes on one of the system lists, and make sure the 'x systems
selected' count (ie, the contents of the SSM) is updated at the same time.

Comment 4 Fanny Augustin 2005-07-19 20:14:04 UTC

Looks good on QA