Bug 160123 - Reconcile our two versions of check_all.js
Reconcile our two versions of check_all.js
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RHN/Web Site (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Robin Norwood
Fanny Augustin
Depends On:
Blocks: 157427
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-06-10 18:42 EDT by David Lutterkort
Modified: 2013-04-30 19:39 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: RHN 4.0.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2005-08-31 22:25:49 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description David Lutterkort 2005-06-10 18:42:21 EDT
My post to rhn-webdev-list and ensuing discussion

I am looking into a bug that seems to be related to check_all.js. The
first thing I noticed is that we have two copies of it in svn:


Only the second one seems to be used on a satellite. Unfortunately, the
two files differ; what is the story behind these two files ? Can I just
delete the one in the java tree ? Does anything need to be merged from
the java/ one into hte web/ one ?
Comment 1 Bret McMillan 2005-06-16 11:51:28 EDT
I think this originally came from rnorwood, but cturner & possible mbowman might
have more data.

And there's always 'svn blame' :)

If there are perl issues as well, file as sub-bugs and we can farm those out to
folks familiar w/ the perl codebase.
Comment 2 David Lutterkort 2005-06-22 15:44:25 EDT
Robin, I think you took care of this already, right ? If not, feel free to
reassign to me with a comment on what still needs to be done.
Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2005-07-14 16:18:19 EDT
On to 'ON_QA'.

Test plan:

This is basically an internal svn/cvs issue, not really any QA to do.  But you
can make sure javascript 'works', ie:

o Use the 'check all on page' checkbox at the top of a list with checkboxes'.
o Use the checkboxes on one of the system lists, and make sure the 'x systems
selected' count (ie, the contents of the SSM) is updated at the same time.
Comment 4 Fanny Augustin 2005-07-19 16:14:04 EDT
Looks good on QA

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.