Bug 160123 - Reconcile our two versions of check_all.js
Summary: Reconcile our two versions of check_all.js
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Network
Classification: Retired
Component: RHN/Web Site
Version: rhn400
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Robin Norwood
QA Contact: Fanny Augustin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 157427
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-06-10 22:42 UTC by David Lutterkort
Modified: 2013-04-30 23:39 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: RHN 4.0.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-01 02:25:49 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description David Lutterkort 2005-06-10 22:42:21 UTC
My post to rhn-webdev-list and ensuing discussion
(http://post-office.corp.redhat.com/archives/rhn-webdev-list/2005-June/msg00974.html):

I am looking into a bug that seems to be related to check_all.js. The
first thing I noticed is that we have two copies of it in svn:

svn/eng/java/code/webapp/javascript/check_all.js
svn/eng/web/html/javascript/check_all.js

Only the second one seems to be used on a satellite. Unfortunately, the
two files differ; what is the story behind these two files ? Can I just
delete the one in the java tree ? Does anything need to be merged from
the java/ one into hte web/ one ?

Comment 1 Bret McMillan 2005-06-16 15:51:28 UTC
I think this originally came from rnorwood, but cturner & possible mbowman might
have more data.

And there's always 'svn blame' :)

If there are perl issues as well, file as sub-bugs and we can farm those out to
folks familiar w/ the perl codebase.

Comment 2 David Lutterkort 2005-06-22 19:44:25 UTC
Robin, I think you took care of this already, right ? If not, feel free to
reassign to me with a comment on what still needs to be done.

Comment 3 Robin Norwood 2005-07-14 20:18:19 UTC
On to 'ON_QA'.

Test plan:

This is basically an internal svn/cvs issue, not really any QA to do.  But you
can make sure javascript 'works', ie:

o Use the 'check all on page' checkbox at the top of a list with checkboxes'.
o Use the checkboxes on one of the system lists, and make sure the 'x systems
selected' count (ie, the contents of the SSM) is updated at the same time.

Comment 4 Fanny Augustin 2005-07-19 20:14:04 UTC
Looks good on QA


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.