Bug 1602034
Summary: | [RFE] Update Virtual Instance Guide to run virt-who less frequently | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Rich Jerrido <rjerrido> |
Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Tahlia Richardson <trichard> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Vlada Grosu <vgrosu> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | Unspecified | CC: | adahms, dvoss, juwu, rjerrido, spetrosi, trichard, wpinheir |
Target Milestone: | Released | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-07-23 14:16:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1658284 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Rich Jerrido
2018-07-17 16:15:13 UTC
*** Bug 1559189 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Assigning to Sergei for review. Sergei - there are one or two changes we need to make here. Mention of the interval is found in two places in the Virtual Instances Guide - https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.4/html-single/virtual_instances_guide/#virtual_machine_subscription_process-1 https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_satellite/6.4/html-single/virtual_instances_guide/#creating-virt-who-configuration-with-hammer The listing of interval in the example in creating a configuration using hammer should be changed to '60' to bring it in line with the default, and the 'Note' admonition box updated to add the note above about changing the default to 3600 as per the above. Before adding the note, it might be good to ask Rich a little more about the 7 day temporary subscription and whether having it is simply enough or whether there is any additional information we should pass on to users. *** Bug 1723441 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The changes for this bug will be published with 6.6 Beta. |