Bug 1607821
| Summary: | heketi is creating separate block hosting volume for every block device request | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Nitin Goyal <nigoyal> |
| Component: | heketi | Assignee: | Michael Adam <madam> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | cns-3.10 | CC: | akrishna, ekuric, hchiramm, jmulligan, kramdoss, nberry, nigoyal, pprakash, rhs-bugs, rtalur, sankarshan, storage-qa-internal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | CNS 3.10 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: |
Heketi can automatically create a new block hosting volume even when there was insufficient disk space on existing block hosting volume. Previously, if more than one request for block volumes were received concurrently Heketi might
create more block hosting volumes than necessary. With this update, Heketi no longer allows clients to automatically trigger the creation of extra block hosting volumes when another request is already creating a block hosting
volume.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-12 09:23:49 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1568862 | ||
|
Description
Nitin Goyal
2018-07-24 11:02:00 UTC
*** Bug 1601380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Updated doc text in the Doc Text field. Please review for technical accuracy. Hi John, I have updated the Doc text based on feedback. Kindly check. (In reply to Anjana from comment #19) > Hi John, > > I have updated the Doc text based on feedback. Kindly check. I think that's an improvement, thanks! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2018:2686 |