Bug 162219
Summary: | FC4 release notes should mention how to use gcc32 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora Documentation | Reporter: | Julius Smith <jos> |
Component: | release-notes | Assignee: | Release Notes Tracker <relnotes> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | devel | CC: | gajownik |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-07-22 21:30:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 151189 |
Description
Julius Smith
2005-06-30 21:36:10 UTC
This is essentially a duplicate of Bug 162217 (a couple of typos were fixed in this version). I apologize for the accidental double posting. reassigning to release notes tracker *** Bug 162217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** If we do this, should we include also compat-lib{gcc,stdc++}-296? This provides (IIRC) compatibility for Red Hat Linux 7.3 apps. For that, how about a new section of the release notes entitled "Backward Compatibility", organized in reverse-chronological order? In that case, the "Caveats" subsection of Section 6.3.1 could simply point to the beginning that section. I would probably insert it as a new Section 7. Please don't forget about CXX variable. Some code does not also compile with g++ from gcc-c++-4.0.0 package (for example tvtime รข http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1230713&group_id=64301&atid=506987). Added to CVS. Close this one. Updated content a bit and included this in a recent publishing of the online release notes: http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc4/errata/ The information above seems to be misleading. The errata does not include a section on backward compatibility. If an errata for this purpose is deemed to be unimportant, We should make this a point for the subsequent versions |