Bug 1630064
| Summary: | python-mapnik: Remove (sub)packages from Fedora 30+: python2-mapnik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> |
| Component: | python-mapnik | Assignee: | Tom Hughes <tom> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | cstratak, igor.raits, mhroncok, ngompa13, pviktori, tom, zbyszek |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-09-17 23:42:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1625773, 1630222 | ||
|
Description
Miro Hrončok
2018-09-17 22:30:37 UTC
Should I be doing something to obsolete the python2 package? The change seems to say no but surely that means people will have dozens of python2 packages installed that aren't being upgraded any more and will eventually start to break updates? The current answer is "no". See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TX5OLJIXJ5KHFRQXCF6M7J2XWRMYFXUY/ for a discussion about this. The problem is that python-mapnik is linked to boost so the next time boost updates anybody with python2-mapnik installed is going to find they can't update boost or anything that uses boost. There are a number of other libraries it links to as well that could cause similar effects but boost is probably the one that changes soname most often. I'm not sure what happens these days when doing an update to a new release using official technologies as I always do it with dnf - does it refuse to update? or just update and leave python2-mapnik broken? I filed Bug #1630222 for the obsoleting and quoted the reason there. |