Bug 1631171

Summary: [Doc RFE] Document the procedure for changing the metric retention period in graphite
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Nishanth Thomas <nthomas>
Component: doc-RHGS_Web_AdministrationAssignee: storage-doc
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Elena Bondarenko <ebondare>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.4CC: asriram, bkunal, ebondare, gshanmug, mbukatov, nthomas, psony, rhs-bugs, sankarshan
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-15 10:13:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1623518    

Description Nishanth Thomas 2018-09-20 07:25:20 UTC 
Description of problem:
Document the procedure for changing the metric retention period in graphite which is as below:

  1. Un-manage the cluster
        2. stop carbon-cache
        3. change retention period in  "/etc/tendrl/monitoring-integration/storage-schemas.conf".(Default it is 180d (6 months).)
>>

     (e.g) if I want to change retention value to 90 days
           [tendrl]
           pattern = ^tendrl\.
           retentions = 60:90d

<<
        4. start carbon-cache
        5. import the cluster again
Comment 5 Elena Bondarenko 2018-12-12 09:20:53 UTC 
I think it would be nice to add somewhere that the commands are to be executed on the Tendrl server, or, better still, that data archival is happening on Tendrl server so that it would be obvious to the reader that the commands are to be executed there. Do you think it would make sense?
Comment 7 Elena Bondarenko 2018-12-14 13:33:07 UTC 
Thanks! I think that the description of this procedure looks good now.
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:12:27 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days