Bug 1631171 - [Doc RFE] Document the procedure for changing the metric retention period in graphite
Summary: [Doc RFE] Document the procedure for changing the metric retention period in ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: doc-RHGS_Web_Administration
Version: rhgs-3.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: storage-doc
QA Contact: Elena Bondarenko
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1623518
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-09-20 07:25 UTC by Nishanth Thomas
Modified: 2023-09-15 00:12 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-02-15 10:13:14 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 1565734 0 unspecified CLOSED Disk utilization and carbon data archiving behaviour 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Internal Links: 1565734

Description Nishanth Thomas 2018-09-20 07:25:20 UTC 
Description of problem:
Document the procedure for changing the metric retention period in graphite which is as below:

  1. Un-manage the cluster
        2. stop carbon-cache
        3. change retention period in  "/etc/tendrl/monitoring-integration/storage-schemas.conf".(Default it is 180d (6 months).)
>>

     (e.g) if I want to change retention value to 90 days
           [tendrl]
           pattern = ^tendrl\.
           retentions = 60:90d

<<
        4. start carbon-cache
        5. import the cluster again
Comment 5 Elena Bondarenko 2018-12-12 09:20:53 UTC 
I think it would be nice to add somewhere that the commands are to be executed on the Tendrl server, or, better still, that data archival is happening on Tendrl server so that it would be obvious to the reader that the commands are to be executed there. Do you think it would make sense?
Comment 7 Elena Bondarenko 2018-12-14 13:33:07 UTC 
Thanks! I think that the description of this procedure looks good now.
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:12:27 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.