Bug 1635694
Summary: | "excludes" CLI option ignores wildcard | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | anouar.chemek, dmach, extras-qa, jmracek, jrohel, luigic, mblaha, mhatina, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame, vondruch |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1628103 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2018-10-05 18:38:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1628103 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Vít Ondruch
2018-10-03 13:45:11 UTC
Please can you confirm that issue is reproducible with libsolv-0.6.35-3 ? Thanks a lot. (In reply to Jaroslav Mracek from comment #1) > Please can you confirm that issue is reproducible with libsolv-0.6.35-3 ? > Thanks a lot. Yes, it is. The libsolv version was part of the original ticket I cloned and stripped (probably too much). I am sorry, but I am unable to reproduce the issue. Please can you provide output from "rpm -q dnf libdnf libsol", "dnf repolist" and "dnf module list". ~~~ $ rpm -q dnf libdnf libsolv dnf-3.6.1-2.fc30.noarch libdnf-0.20.0-2.fc30.x86_64 libsolv-0.6.35-3.fc30.x86_64 ~~~ I'll rather give you more explicit reproducer, so repositories won't play any role: ~~~ $ sudo dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide -x kernel\* Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:27 ago on Fri Oct 5 12:12:17 2018. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64 - package kernel-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 2: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-4.18.5-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 3: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-4.18.10-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 4: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-core-4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64 - package kernel-core-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 5: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-core-4.18.5-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-core-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 6: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-core-4.18.10-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-core-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 7: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-modules-4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64 - package kernel-modules-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 8: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-modules-4.18.5-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-modules-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded Problem 9: cannot install the best update candidate for package kernel-modules-4.18.10-300.fc29.x86_64 - package kernel-modules-4.19.0-0.rc5.git3.1.fc30.x86_64 is excluded ... snip ... ~~~ BTW this is also interesting (note the missing wildcard): ~~~ $ LANG=C.UTF-8 sudo dnf update --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide -x kernel Last metadata expiration check: 0:09:13 ago on Fri Oct 5 12:12:17 2018. Error: Problem: package kernel-4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64 requires kernel-core-uname-r = 4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - problem with installed package kernel-4.17.14-200.fc28.x86_64 ~~~ Comparing to previous, there were other packages, which would be installed. This case fails without any attempt to install any package. Ok, In upstream I have an additional change for upgrade command that should fix the problem (dnf copr enable jmracek/dnf-upstream). Hope that it helps. There were multiple problems at the same place with nearly identical reports. I am not sure I can install the DNF from Copr on my Rawhide. So I'll wait. The issue is just a bit annoying, not end of the world ;) This is a duplicate of 1616118. Please if solution doesn't help, just reopen the bug report. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1616118 *** |