Bug 163663

Summary: glyphs are missing at the rendering
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Component: ghostscriptAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: davidz, eng-i18n-bugs
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-06 02:29:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 150221    
Attachments:
Description Flags
a testcase
none
a screenshot on FC4
none
a screenshot on devel none

Description Akira TAGOH 2005-07-20 02:13:15 UTC 
Description of problem:
When I previewed a PostScript file with gs8, obviously some glyphs are not rendered.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.look at an attached PS file with gs8
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
some glyphs are missing.

Expected results:
all glyphs should be shown properly.

Additional info:
This is an regression bug. it worked on FC4.
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2005-07-20 02:13:15 UTC 
Created attachment 116960 [details]
a testcase
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2005-07-20 02:15:28 UTC 
Created attachment 116961 [details]
a screenshot on FC4
Comment 3 Akira TAGOH 2005-07-20 02:15:54 UTC 
Created attachment 116962 [details]
a screenshot on devel
Comment 4 Tim Waugh 2005-07-27 17:33:02 UTC 
davidz: Could this be related to freetype?
Comment 5 Tim Waugh 2005-08-09 13:58:02 UTC 
This still seems to happen with 8.15-0.rc3.7.
Comment 6 Akira TAGOH 2005-09-02 03:05:01 UTC 
no glyphs are missing on the testcase with 8.15-0.rc4.3 anymore. but the last
line (the left line) is rendered over the outer frame. should I close this and
file an another bug for that?
Comment 7 Tim Waugh 2005-09-05 12:15:50 UTC 
Yes please.