Bug 1642854

Summary: glusterd: raise default transport.listen-backlog to 1024
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Milind Changire <mchangir>
Component: glusterdAssignee: Milind Changire <mchangir>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Rochelle <rallan>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rhgs-3.4CC: amukherj, bugs, mchangir, rhs-bugs, sanandpa, sankarshan, sheggodu, storage-qa-internal, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: ZStream
Target Release: RHGS 3.4.z Batch Update 2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.12.2-27 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1642850 Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-12-17 17:07:11 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1642850    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Milind Changire 2018-10-25 08:38:17 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1642850 +++

Description of problem:
data center setups with large number of bricks with replication causes a flood of connections to glusterd causing connections to be dropped due to insufficient backlog queue length

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
frequently

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:
connections to glusterd should not be dropped or refused

Additional info:

Comment 2 Atin Mukherjee 2018-10-25 08:49:48 UTC
This was seen in ENEL setup.

Comment 3 Milind Changire 2018-10-25 09:05:34 UTC
upstream patch: https://review.gluster.org/c/glusterfs/+/21482

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2018-12-17 17:07:11 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3827