Bug 164509
Summary: | ifup-eth code order for wireless cards breaks Master mode configuration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Brett L. Trotter <blt> |
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | leeryman, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-10-03 18:04:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 150221 |
Description
Brett L. Trotter
2005-07-28 13:13:35 UTC
Actually, now that i look at it, i think the only modification necessary is the moving of the wireless check - the extra if within the bridging section fails to bring the interface up now. Sorry! I believe some clarification is needed here. If a ethernet device is bridged (by having a "BRIDGE=br0" or similar entry in its ifcfg-eth* script), then nothing after line 79 in the ifup-eth script is executed because of the `exit 0` after the radvd reload. This includes, amongst other things, the check by the ifup-eth script to see if the device has wireless extensions and if so, the execution of ifup-wireless. Therefore none of your wireless parameters are actually propergated to the device. As to what the sollution is, I'm not entirely sure just moving the wireless check is sufficient. I have only a limited knowledge in these scripts; can any of the experts please determin if anything after the bridge check is also neccessary to be invoked? If so, either the checks need to be reordered or something needs to be done about the exit 0 on line 79. Kind regards. |