Bug 1645475

Summary:	[RFE] Add support for GlusterFS fuse mountOptions via Storage class.
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Humble Chirammal <hchiramm>
Component:	kubernetes	Assignee:	Humble Chirammal <hchiramm>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Prasanth <pprakash>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	ocs-3.11	CC:	jmulligan, knarra, madam, rhs-bugs
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Reopened, ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-09-06 15:30:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1641685, 1641915

Description Humble Chirammal 2018-11-02 10:30:21 UTC

Description of problem:

At present, Glusterfs driver in openshift does not support mountOptions via storage class. With this RFE implementation, various fuse mount options will be supported via SC of glusterfs driver in OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2019-01-24 14:31:29 UTC

Unlikely to happen due to capacity.
Please reopen if you think we need to further discuss.

Comment 6 Humble Chirammal 2019-02-05 13:16:46 UTC

Reopening it for consideration of qualification in OCP 3.11 batch update 2.

Comment 8 RamaKasturi 2019-04-27 18:18:22 UTC

Hello John,

   I do think we can take this in for BU3 due to bandwidth.

   And to consider testing it for further releases would like to understand few things below & if this is going to be a great benefit for the customer we can propose this for a qualification for the next batch update.

1) What is the scope of testing required here ?

2) How is this RFE going to benefit the customer / user ?

3) Are there any customer cases which really require this feature ?

Thanks
kasturi