Bug 1645475 - [RFE] Add support for GlusterFS fuse mountOptions via Storage class.
Summary: [RFE] Add support for GlusterFS fuse mountOptions via Storage class.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: kubernetes
Version: ocs-3.11
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Humble Chirammal
QA Contact: Prasanth
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: OCS-3.11.1-Engineering-Proposed-BZs OCS-3.11.1-devel-triage-done
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2018-11-02 10:30 UTC by Humble Chirammal
Modified: 2019-09-06 15:30 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-06 15:30:37 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Humble Chirammal 2018-11-02 10:30:21 UTC
Description of problem:

At present, Glusterfs driver in openshift does not support mountOptions via storage class. With this RFE implementation, various fuse mount options will be supported via SC of glusterfs driver in OCP.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2019-01-24 14:31:29 UTC
Unlikely to happen due to capacity.
Please reopen if you think we need to further discuss.

Comment 6 Humble Chirammal 2019-02-05 13:16:46 UTC
Reopening it for consideration of qualification in OCP 3.11 batch update 2.

Comment 8 RamaKasturi 2019-04-27 18:18:22 UTC
Hello John,

   I do think we can take this in for BU3 due to bandwidth.

   And to consider testing it for further releases would like to understand few things below & if this is going to be a great benefit for the customer we can propose this for a qualification for the next batch update.

1) What is the scope of testing required here ?

2) How is this RFE going to benefit the customer / user ?

3) Are there any customer cases which really require this feature ?

Thanks
kasturi


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.