Bug 1649720
Summary: | Unlimited setting for filter does not get rendered in the UI | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Satellite | Reporter: | Peter Ondrejka <pondrejk> |
Component: | Users & Roles | Assignee: | satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Radovan Drazny <rdrazny> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.5.0 | CC: | dhlavacd, mhulan, pondrejk |
Target Milestone: | Unspecified | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | Unused | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-11-21 09:33:21 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Ondrejka
2018-11-14 11:00:21 UTC
Is the role or filter assigned to some organization/location? Is this a 6.5 regression? Checked again on 6.5 snap 13. It is reproducible only if role is assigned to one or more organizations, location setting does not have an effect. Looking at 6.4 Satellite I can reproduce the same problem. This is expected behavior, per the inline help: "If the unlimited field is enabled, the filter applies to all resources of the selected type. If the unlimited field is disabled, you can specify further filtering using Foreman search syntax in the search field.> If the role is associated with organizations or locations, the filters are not considered unlimited as they are scoped accordingly." The most important here to notice here, if filter are associated with some org/log, they are limited. The experience has changed over last few versions a bit, since we encourage people to assign org/locs to the role. So there may be another RFE that will rename that checkbox or change the logic in showing the checkmark, but I'm closing this as NOTABUG. Please reopen if I missed something. |