Bug 1651478

Summary:	Both templates say "For OCP 3.10:" instead of "For OCP 3.9:" and "For OCP 3.10:" in Chapter 7 of documentation.
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Kshithij Iyer <kiyer>
Component:	doc-Container_Native_Storage_with_OpenShift	Assignee:	storage-doc
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	ocs-3.11	CC:	asriram, kiyer, knarra, lxia, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, storage-doc, storage-qa-internal, vinug
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-02-25 07:02:35 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1672844

Description Kshithij Iyer 2018-11-20 08:08:41 UTC

Document URL: 
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/3.11/html-single/deployment_guide/#chap-Upgrade_CRS

Section Number and Name: 
Part III. Upgrade
- Chapter 7. Upgrading Your Red Hat Openshift Container Storage in Independent Mode
-- 7.2.3. Upgrading Heketi in Openshift node 
 And
--7.2.4. Upgrading Gluster Block

Describe the issue: 
In step 4 of section 7.2.3, both the templates given say "For OCP 3.10:" instead of "For OCP 3.10:" and "For OCP 3.9:" which makes it confusing for the user to differentiate between the templates to be used while upgrading from 3.9 and 3.10. The same mistake is observed in step 8 of section 7.2.4.   

Suggestions for improvement: 


Additional information:

Comment 3 RamaKasturi 2019-02-20 09:40:41 UTC

Can you please take a look at the doc and let me know if this bug is still valid ?

Acking for 3.11.1 but making a quick check with kshijith to see if this still valid ?