Bug 1661529

Summary:	Document how to use diagnostics commands introduced in RFE 1641680
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Raghavendra Talur <rtalur>
Component:	doc-Container_Native_Storage_with_OpenShift	Assignee:	storage-doc
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Nitin Goyal <nigoyal>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	ocs-3.11	CC:	akrishna, asriram, jmulligan, knarra, kramdoss, madam, nigoyal, rhs-bugs, rtalur, sankarshan, storage-doc
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	OCS 3.11.z Batch Update 3
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:	This release introduces two diagnostics features in Heketi: * The new command `heketi-cli db check` and its offline server variant `heketi db check` to check the consistency of heketi's database. *The new command `heketi-cli server state examine gluster` and its server counterpart `heketi offline state examine gluster` compares data from Gluster with that in heketi's database to detect out-of-sync situations.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-07-22 13:29:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1641680
Bug Blocks:	1694089

Description Raghavendra Talur 2018-12-21 13:24:22 UTC

Description of problem:
RFE 1641680 has introduced two commands for diagnosis of heketi state. We need to document the same in Admin guide.

Comment 2 krishnaram Karthick 2019-01-09 06:46:57 UTC

(In reply to Raghavendra Talur from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> RFE 1641680 has introduced two commands for diagnosis of heketi state. We
> need to document the same in Admin guide.

Talur, can you please update the bug with the content or point to a doc or readme page?

Comment 8 Anjana KD 2019-02-06 12:38:45 UTC

Updated the doc text.

Comment 24 RamaKasturi 2019-04-05 13:10:56 UTC

Hello Anjana,

   I see that the above changes are not going into the document based on comment 15 and i feel that verification of kcs article is an async task outside of release. So not acking the bug here for 3.11.3. Please let me know if you think otherwise.

Thanks
kasturi

Comment 25 Anjana Suparna Sriram 2019-04-08 11:16:50 UTC

(In reply to RamaKasturi from comment #24)
> Hello Anjana,
> 
>    I see that the above changes are not going into the document based on
> comment 15 and i feel that verification of kcs article is an async task
> outside of release. So not acking the bug here for 3.11.3. Please let me
> know if you think otherwise.
> 
> Thanks
> kasturi

Hi Kasturi,

I agree this is a KCS article, but this bug was addressed for 3.11.2 but was not tracked. Hence to ensure this bug is resolved I have attached it to the tracker.

Regards,
Anjana