Bug 1667197

Summary: nonresponsive package maintainer Rich Mattes
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component: catkinAssignee: Rich Mattes <richmattes>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: richmattes, robotics, thofmann, tim
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-01-28 16:43:25 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1313844, 1317919, 1324122, 1324123, 1634715    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 Tim Niemueller 2019-01-17 20:29:37 UTC
I'm pretty surprised, Rich has been very responsive to robotics packages in need of help. I have pinged him on his private address, he probably is just busy.

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2019-01-17 20:37:52 UTC
Thanks, Tim.

That first bug is open since 2016.

Comment 3 Tim Niemueller 2019-01-17 20:49:56 UTC
 I guess it hadn't made the top of his list then. The last email on fedora-dev is from Nov 2018 and the last update on a package we co-maintain is from 30.12.2018. So, he is around and just hasn't gotten to it, yet, I assume.

Comment 4 Rich Mattes 2019-01-17 22:01:08 UTC
Python 3 support in ROS is an ongoing effort - https://discourse.ros.org/t/planning-future-ros-1-distribution-s/6538  It looks like some of the Debian packages are built with python 3, but 

I've been trying to figure out what the best path forward is with these packages for a while.  I think I may just orphan them as they aren't really useful in their current form, and I don't have much spare time to put into the huge effort of packaging ROS.  If someone else has the time to keep pushing this forward I would be interested in helping where I can, but I can't drive the effort.

Comment 5 Rich Mattes 2019-01-17 22:02:26 UTC
(In reply to Rich Mattes from comment #4)
> Python 3 support in ROS is an ongoing effort -
> https://discourse.ros.org/t/planning-future-ros-1-distribution-s/6538  It
> looks like some of the Debian packages are built with python 3, but 
Oops.  But, I would need to do some research to see if these packages are compatible.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2019-01-17 22:53:29 UTC
Thanks for responding, Rich!

If you don't have time I suggest you orphan the packages so somebody else can take them and work on this.

Maybe try to reach for a volunteer at the devel list?

Comment 7 Rich Mattes 2019-01-20 17:22:17 UTC
That's a good plan, I sent a message to the list today.  The freenect package isn't part of the ROS effort, I'll try to see what's going on with that package.

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2019-01-28 16:43:25 UTC
Thanks.