Bug 1678135
| Summary: | [RFE] As an Automate Designer, I should be able to pass variables between Successive Playbook Method in a State Machine | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Loic Avenel <lavenel> |
| Component: | Automate | Assignee: | Lucy Fu <lufu> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ganesh Hubale <ghubale> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs> |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | unspecified | CC: | cbolz, ghubale, mfeifer, mkanoor, obarenbo, simaishi, tfitzger |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | RFE |
| Target Release: | 5.11.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.11.0.14 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-12-12 13:35:44 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1677548 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Loic Avenel
2019-02-18 08:01:26 UTC
New commits detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/1eaaa52fbf48a3ca3c9545c566e3e4e3568e26eb commit 1eaaa52fbf48a3ca3c9545c566e3e4e3568e26eb Author: Lucy Fu <lufu> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 17 16:08:53 2019 -0400 Commit: Lucy Fu <lufu> CommitDate: Mon Jun 17 16:08:53 2019 -0400 Save playbook set_stats data for successive playbook method in a state machine. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135 app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner.rb | 8 + 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/ca38a0c6b91f4cbd26590d33687d2dbeb145dcf3 commit ca38a0c6b91f4cbd26590d33687d2dbeb145dcf3 Author: Lucy Fu <lufu> AuthorDate: Mon Jun 17 16:12:23 2019 -0400 Commit: Lucy Fu <lufu> CommitDate: Mon Jun 17 16:12:23 2019 -0400 Add name for temporary Ansible template which will be used as the name for ManageIQ::Providers::EmbeddedAnsible::AutomationManager::Job. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135 app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner.rb | 1 + spec/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner_spec.rb | 3 + 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-automation_engine/master: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-automation_engine/commit/f179578e73093070d4735386524e5787e2811ce0 commit f179578e73093070d4735386524e5787e2811ce0 Author: Lucy Fu <lufu> AuthorDate: Tue Jun 18 11:38:23 2019 -0400 Commit: Lucy Fu <lufu> CommitDate: Tue Jun 18 11:38:23 2019 -0400 Save playbook set_stats data for successive playbook methods. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135 lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_engine/miq_ae_ansible_method_base.rb | 28 +- spec/miq_ae_playbook_method_spec.rb | 9 +- 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Hi Ganesh, We have an Automate domain and service dialog that you can use in your testing. Can we setup a brief meeting to discuss? Thanks, Tina Yes Tina. Hi Ganesh, Per our meeting the other day, we have an Automate domain and service dialog that you can use to test the new functionality. One concern was that you wouldn't be able to test right away since the 5.11 environment would not allow you enable the embedded ansible role. My understanding is that that should work, and shouldn't require a hack. Billy is going to send you an email with the materials and directions(along with the BlueJeans recording) to start testing. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Tina Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199 |