Bug 1678135 - [RFE] As an Automate Designer, I should be able to pass variables between Successive Playbook Method in a State Machine
Summary: [RFE] As an Automate Designer, I should be able to pass variables between Suc...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Automate
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: GA
: 5.11.0
Assignee: Lucy Fu
QA Contact: Ganesh Hubale
Red Hat CloudForms Documentation
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1677548
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-02-18 08:01 UTC by Loic Avenel
Modified: 2019-12-12 13:35 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 5.11.0.14
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-12-12 13:35:44 UTC
Category: ---
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2019:4199 0 None None None 2019-12-12 13:35:58 UTC

Description Loic Avenel 2019-02-18 08:01:26 UTC
As an Automate Designer, I should be able to pass variables between Successive Playbook Method in a State Machine

Comment 6 CFME Bot 2019-07-08 21:55:35 UTC
New commits detected on ManageIQ/manageiq/master:

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/1eaaa52fbf48a3ca3c9545c566e3e4e3568e26eb
commit 1eaaa52fbf48a3ca3c9545c566e3e4e3568e26eb
Author:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 17 16:08:53 2019 -0400
Commit:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
CommitDate: Mon Jun 17 16:08:53 2019 -0400

    Save playbook set_stats data for successive playbook method in a state machine.

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135

 app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner.rb | 8 +
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)


https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/commit/ca38a0c6b91f4cbd26590d33687d2dbeb145dcf3
commit ca38a0c6b91f4cbd26590d33687d2dbeb145dcf3
Author:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
AuthorDate: Mon Jun 17 16:12:23 2019 -0400
Commit:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
CommitDate: Mon Jun 17 16:12:23 2019 -0400

    Add name for temporary Ansible template

    which will be used as the name for ManageIQ::Providers::EmbeddedAnsible::AutomationManager::Job.

    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135

 app/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner.rb | 1 +
 spec/models/manageiq/providers/embedded_ansible/automation_manager/playbook_runner_spec.rb | 3 +
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comment 7 CFME Bot 2019-07-08 22:17:28 UTC
New commit detected on ManageIQ/manageiq-automation_engine/master:

https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-automation_engine/commit/f179578e73093070d4735386524e5787e2811ce0
commit f179578e73093070d4735386524e5787e2811ce0
Author:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
AuthorDate: Tue Jun 18 11:38:23 2019 -0400
Commit:     Lucy Fu <lufu>
CommitDate: Tue Jun 18 11:38:23 2019 -0400

    Save playbook set_stats data for successive playbook methods.

        https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678135

 lib/miq_automation_engine/engine/miq_ae_engine/miq_ae_ansible_method_base.rb | 28 +-
 spec/miq_ae_playbook_method_spec.rb | 9 +-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comment 8 Tina Fitzgerald 2019-07-12 13:16:54 UTC
Hi Ganesh,

We have an Automate domain and service dialog that you can use in your testing.
Can we setup a brief meeting to discuss?

Thanks,
Tina

Comment 9 Ganesh Hubale 2019-07-12 13:26:41 UTC
Yes Tina.

Comment 10 Tina Fitzgerald 2019-07-17 14:52:46 UTC
Hi Ganesh,

Per our meeting the other day, we have an Automate domain and service dialog that you can use to test the new functionality.

One concern was that you wouldn't be able to test right away since the 5.11 environment would not allow you enable the embedded ansible role.
My understanding is that that should work, and shouldn't require a hack. 

Billy is going to send you an email with the materials and directions(along with the BlueJeans recording) to start testing.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Tina

Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2019-12-12 13:35:44 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:4199


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.