Bug 1679283
| Summary: | newer 32-bit ARM processors missing from RPM detection/macros | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Packaging Maintenance Team <packaging-team-maint> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 30 | CC: | igor.raits, mjw, packaging-team-maint, pbrobinson, pmatilai, pmoravco, pwhalen, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-06-13 12:52:22 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 245418 | ||
Although possibly unrelated, it might be possible that this fixes the need to do `dnf --forcearch armv7hl` when running dnf in this enviroment too. Moving to POST to indicate it's already fixed upstream. Fixed in rawhide as of rpm >= 4.14.90. This might get backported to older Fedoras in time. |
Description of problem: It appears that the .rpm version being used in fedora is missing commits: b1f81b837 Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in and %arm macro 7f0e0b5be Fix %arm macro to include newer processor types 8c3a7b8fa Improve ARM detection (due to them not being the in the latest release AFAIK) This means that when run on a more recent processor (in a container) rpm fails to detect the platform correctly. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 4.14.2.1 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Running a 64-bit/aarch64 distro, install the 32-bit/armv7 container 2. note the platform name with uname 3. it should be something like `armv8l` 4. Attempt to build rpm's which have ${arm} macros Actual results: The ${arm} sections are skipped Expected results: The ${arm} sections are honored