Bug 168097
Summary: | Review Request: digiKam - A digital camera accessing & photo management application | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marcin Garski <mgarski> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Aurelien Bompard <gauret> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | rdieter:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://manta.univ.gda.pl/~mgarski/FE/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-09-17 15:34:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marcin Garski
2005-09-12 13:17:17 UTC
* In the URL tag, change prdownloads.sourceforge.net to dl.sf.net to allow direct download * Duplicate BuildRequires: qt-devel, kdelibs-devel, arts-devel, libtiff-devel, pkgconfig, autoconf * "make -f Makefile.cvs" is useless * Add --disable-debug to %configure * Install desktop file with desktop-file-install. Here's what you could use: desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category Application \ --add-category Photograph \ --add-category Graphics \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applnk/Graphics/%{name}.desktop and for showfoto desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --delete-original \ --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \ --add-category X-Fedora \ --add-category Application \ --add-category Photograph \ --add-category Graphics \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications/kde/showfoto.desktop * The desktop file contains Mime types, so you have to add the required bits in the scriptlets (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets, section about "desktop-database") * The package add files in /usr/share/icons, so you also have to update gtk's cache in the scriptlets (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets, section about "GTK+ icon cache") New package on the server (with the same release version), all bugs should be fixed. > New package on the server (with the same release version)
Please update the release, it makes it easier for the reviewer to say "release X
approved"
* Duplicate BuildRequires: kdelibs-devel (already required by libkexif-devel)
* Requirements: missing dependancy on gtk-update-icon-cache (package gtk2)
* since you removed make -f Makefile.cvs, you don't need automake as a BR anymore
Rex, you might be interested in this package too... (feel free to un'CC yourself if you don't) Thanks, I thought I had already CC'd myself, so thanks for doing it for me. (-: Release 2 on server with one exception: * Requirements: missing dependancy on gtk-update-icon-cache (package gtk2) On http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ScriptletSnippets you can read: "GTK+ icon cache" "Note that _no_ dependencies should be added for this. If gtk-update-icon-cache is not available, there's nothing that would be needing the cache update. Not adding the dependency on gtk-update-icon-cache (ie. gtk2 >= 2.6.0) makes it easier to use the package (or the same specfile) on systems where it's not available nor needed, such as older distro versions or (very) trimmed down installations." So I didn't add requirements you mentioned. Good point, sorry about that. Will review shortly. Review for release 2: APPROVED * RPM name is OK * Source digikam-0.7.4.tar.bz2 is the same as upstream * Builds fine in mock * rpmlint of digikam looks OK * rpmlint of digikam-devel looks OK * File list of digikam looks OK * File list of digikam-devel looks OK * Seems to work fine Unless Rex has something to improve, you're fine with me. After import, please add something in %description concerning the package kipi-plugins, like : "The image editor is extensible via plugins, install the kipi-plugins package to use them" (adapt at will) As I see there isn't kipi-plugins package in FC or FE. Should I add description about something that currently don't exist in FE? Hmm, right, my kipi-plugins rpm came from kde-redhat. You can forget about the description for the moment, and if you feel like packaging kipi-plugins, feel free to do so... :) Maybe, maybe I'll package it :) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: digikam New Branches: EL-5 cvs done. |