Bug 1685612
Summary: | python34: Invent a workaround for when compat-openssl10 is gone | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Miro Hrončok <mhroncok> | ||||
Component: | python34 | Assignee: | Victor Stinner <vstinner> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | cstratak, kevin, mhroncok, pviktori, python-sig, TicoTimo, tmraz, torsava | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2019-08-06 13:15:14 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Miro Hrončok
2019-03-05 16:20:18 UTC
Can we just get moved to python36 by then and drop python34? Maybe getting a list of where python 3.4 is used on the wild, would be beneficial to determine if we want to retire the package. This is not EPEL, but Fedora. We have Python 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8. We don't "move" from 3.4 to 3.6, we offer all used versions for developers to test their software. Python 3.4 will EOL upstream quite soon: 2019-03-16 [0], yet I don't feel confident removing it yet. As long as 3.4 is used by developers, we'd like to keep it for them to test their SW on. It is still used in: * EPEL6 - EOLs November 2020 (AFAIK) * EPEL7 - might be superseded by 3.6 but 3.4 is not going away, stays to at least 2024 (AFAIK) (we can theoretically work on retiring it there) * Ubuntu 14.04 LTS - EOLs soon (2019-04-30), but has 3 more years ESM [1][2] * Debian jessie (oldstable) - not sure how much developers care about oldstable [0] https://devguide.python.org/#status-of-python-branches [1] https://blog.ubuntu.com/2018/09/19/extended-security-maintenance-ubuntu-14-04-trusty-tahr [2] April 2022 Ah right, misunderstood. Victor will look at the changes between 3.4 and 3.5 in SSL and try to assess if backporting makes sense. I proposed a backport downstream of the 3.5 change which adds support for OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and 1.1.1): https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12211 > I proposed a backport downstream of the 3.5 change which adds support for OpenSSL 1.1.0 (and 1.1.1): > https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/12211 I had been rejected by Python 3.4 Release Manager (Larry Hastings) which was afraid of merging such non trivial change in the *last* Python 3.4.10 release. I created a PR for python34 in Fedora Rawhide: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python34/pull-request/32 I updated my Python 3.4 PR based on the Python 3.5 downstream change. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python34/pull-request/32 |