Bug 168620
| Summary: | update to 0.96 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | drago01 | ||||
| Component: | gwget | Assignee: | Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2005-09-22 16:57:07 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
drago01
2005-09-18 11:30:35 UTC
Yeah, I'll look at it. You don't accidently know rpm packaging? If yes, you could provide a patch against the current spec-file from CVS http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/gwget/?root=extras and the update might happen faster ;-) I lost interest in this package and don't use it anymore. I'm willing to continue to maintain it, but it's probably better if someone who actually uses it would do that. Are you interested? I could act as proxy for the extras-cvs if you like. Can do this but there is a problem: your patch (x86_64 fix) does not apply agains 0.96 (In reply to comment #2) > Can do this but there is a problem: > your patch (x86_64 fix) does not apply agains 0.96 Just drop it, it should work fine without it now. I can test that myself and regenerate the patch if it's still needed it fails here: ----- gcc -Wall -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wunused -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-prototypes -O1 -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -m64 -mtune=nocona -o gwget gwget-marshal.o GNOME_Gwget-stubs.o GNOME_Gwget-common.o GNOME_Gwget-skels.o main.o main_window.o main_window_cb.o gwget_data.o wget-log.o utils.o custom-cell-renderer-progressbar.o new_window.o eggtrayicon.o systray.o gwget-application-server.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lgnome-2 /usr/lib/libpopt.so -lart_lgpl_2 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgnomevfs-2 -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lglade-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 /usr/lib/libpopt.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format collect2: ld returned 1 exit status ------------------- it should link against /usr/lib64/libpopt.so (In reply to comment #4) > it fails here: :-| > ----- [...] > /usr/lib/libpopt.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong format > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > ------------------- > it should link against /usr/lib64/libpopt.so You can avoid this by uninstalling popt.i386 on your machine. In the buildsystem only x86_64 packages are installed. Therefore is should not happen and we can ignore it. Created attachment 118991 [details]
patch for specfile update
here is the patch.
(updated tarball is needed)
I also updated the urls in the spec files because they whent up to date
build for devel and FC-4. Some other fixes and updates were needed, but thx for the help! |