Bug 1691832
| Summary: | NFSISO test failed on f30 (20190320) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michel Normand <normand> | ||||||||
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Jiri Konecny <jkonecny> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||||||
| Version: | 30 | CC: | anaconda-maint-list, awilliam, dan, gmarr, hannsj_uhl, jonathan, kellin, lruzicka, robatino, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vponcova, wwoods | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | powerpc | ||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | AcceptedBlocker | ||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | anaconda-30.25.5-1 anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2019-04-11 02:14:07 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1071880, 1574715 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Michel Normand
2019-03-22 15:53:42 UTC
Created attachment 1546948 [details]
nfsiso_variation_check_install_source_anaconda.log
Created attachment 1546949 [details]
nfsiso_variation_check_install_source_journalctl.log
I do not know what additional data you need for investigation, what else do you need ? I verified that same test is still working for f29 (so problem only since f30) as per anaconda log extracts and source line, I assume not a problem of iso mount,
but probably get_base_repo_metadata (1) reporting None as repo_md
Do not have lines in anaconda.log to explain why.
Is there a way to have more info ?
=== extract anaconda.log
10:47:40,272 DBG payload: Setting up nfs install device
10:47:40,275 INF payload: mounting 10.0.2.110:/iso:nfsvers=4 on /run/install/source
10:47:41,261 INF threading: Thread Done: AnaTimeInitThread (140735478428032)
10:47:41,280 DBG image: Checking /run/install/source/image.iso
10:47:41,291 DBG image: mounting /run/install/source/image.iso on /mnt/install/cdimage
10:47:41,359 DBG image: Reading .discinfo
10:47:41,375 DBG image: discArch = ppc64le
10:47:41,388 WRN image: /run/install/source/image.iso doesn't have repodata, skipping
10:47:41,511 DBG payload: retrieving treeinfo from file:///run/install/source/image.iso (proxy: None ; ssl_verify: True)
...
10:48:12,760 WRN payload: Install tree metadata fetching failed: Can't get .treeinfo file from the url file:///run/install/source/image.iso
10:48:12,761 DBG payload: getting release version from tree at file:///run/install/source/image.iso (30)
10:48:12,761 DBG payload: using default release version of 30
===
(1)
===
./anaconda.upstream/pyanaconda/image.py:100: if not _check_repodata(mount_path):
./anaconda.upstream/pyanaconda/image.py:135:def _check_repodata(mount_path):
install_tree_meta = InstallTreeMetadata()
repo_md = install_tree_meta.get_base_repo_metadata()
===
https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/blob/master/pyanaconda/payload/install_tree_metadata.py#L188
this test case backs a Final criterion and this bug doesn't seem to be especially arch-specific so far, so proposing as a Final blocker. Criterion: "The installer must be able to use all supported local and remote package and installer sources." - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Final_Release_Criteria#Package_and_installer_sources Discussed during the 2019-04-01 blocker review meeting: [1] The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedBlocker" was made as it violates the following criteria: "The installer must be able to use all supported local and remote package and installer sources." [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2019-04-01/f30-blocker-review.2019-04-01-16.00.txt anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e2e3cfdb2b I built a new iso with Anaconda 30.25.5-1 and I was able to select an ISO file on a NFS share, Anaconda sucessfully installed the server from the DVD iso and the system booted up withou issues. Unfortunately, I did not keep any logs from the installation, if needed I could install again and keep them this time. However, I think that problem is FIXED. anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e2e3cfdb2b anaconda-30.25.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. with the new anaconda it seems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699179 happens instead. openQA is seeing that as well as Geoff. The thing openQA was seeing was something different, a bug in the test; with that fixed it seems to be working now. Thanks. |