Bug 169550
Summary: | Error: Missing Dependency: apel-xemacs >= 10.5 is needed by package wl-xemacs | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sam. <tech> |
Component: | xemacs-sumo | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <scop> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa, petersen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-15 18:51:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sam.
2005-09-29 16:01:31 UTC
(Cc'ing Jens, the FC wl maintainer, just a FYI.) The problem is that there's no separate apel-xemacs package any more, and xemacs-sumo provides only version 10.2. Further, there's no wl-xemacs package in FC4 nor Extras for FC4. Unfortunately the best I can suggest is to manually remove wl-xemacs, and then try updating again. "yum upgrade" (not "yum update") could also help, but I haven't tested that. Hmm, ok - I plan to submit wl to Extras one day though... It is strange that yum doesn't see the higher version of apel-xemacs. It probably does see it, but xemacs-sumo has "Obsoletes: apel-xemacs < 10.6-6" for upgrades. ddskk requires apel-10.6 to build, so I'm unable to build it currently in Extras. The ddskk specfile in CVS lists apel 10.2 as the minimum needed version...? More relevant discussion is in bug 162952, but Jens, please open a new separate bug and let's try to work it out there in case it's really 10.6 of apel that's required for ddskk and not 10.2. It's not the same problem as this wl-xemacs one, so it's better discussed elsewhere. Ok, the ddskk.spec file is wrong then, because the build fails without 10.6. It is not an upgrade problem, but it essentially amounts to the same thing. Anyway let me open a new bug as you request. |