Summary: | [upi-on-aws] ClusterName.AllowedPattern in cloudformation is blocking user to include '-' char in cluster name | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
Component: | Installer | Assignee: | Abhinav Dahiya <adahiya> |
Installer sub component: | openshift-installer | QA Contact: | Johnny Liu <jialiu> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | ||
Priority: | medium | CC: | scuppett, wsun |
Version: | 4.1.0 | Keywords: | BetaBlocker, Reopened |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.1.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-06-04 10:47:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: |
Description
Johnny Liu
2019-04-04 06:50:02 UTC
The cloud formations serve as *examples* to setup user provisioned infrastructure. There is no expectation of it adhering to installer provisioned infrastructure standards. From customer view, user would start his/her 1st upi setup using these *examples*, why not make these *example* more thoughtful. And I think this fix is not hard, still suggest to fix it. Verified this bug with the fixed templates, and PASS. # oc get machineset -n openshift-machine-api NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AVAILABLE AGE jialiu-upi2-5gwpw-worker-us-east-2a 0 0 179m jialiu-upi2-5gwpw-worker-us-east-2b 0 0 179m jialiu-upi2-5gwpw-worker-us-east-2c 0 0 179m Here my clustername is 'jialiu-upi2' Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0758 |