Bug 1713798

Summary: multisite: 'radosgw-admin bucket sync status' should call syncs_from(source.name) instead of id
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao>
Component: RGW-MultisiteAssignee: Matt Benjamin (redhat) <mbenjamin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vidushi Mishra <vimishra>
Severity: medium Docs Contact: Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.2CC: assingh, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, mbenjamin, rmandyam, tserlin
Target Milestone: z4   
Target Release: 3.3   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-12.2.12-92.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_12.2.12-88redhat1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
.The `radosgw-admin bucket sync status` command works for single-direction sync set up Previously, if a zone was set up with the `sync_from_all` parameter set to `false`, the command `radosgw-admin bucket sync status` reported as “not in sync_from” because the underlying function expected a zone name instead of zone ID that was provided. The underlying source code has been modified, and `radosgw-admin bucket sync status` works as expected in the described situation.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-06 08:27:04 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1726135    

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2019-05-24 21:06:44 UTC 
Description of problem:
multisite: 'radosgw-admin bucket sync status' should call syncs_from(source.name) instead of id


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHCS 3.2.z2
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2020-04-06 08:27:04 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1320
Comment 16 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-14 05:29:14 UTC 
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days