Bug 171410
Summary: | xmlsec1: omit /usr/lib/lib*.la, /usr/lib/lib*.a | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | xmlsec1 | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 1.2.9-7 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-06-08 13:39:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Rex Dieter
2005-10-21 16:04:42 UTC
for .la, yes for .a no, I don't see the madness Daniel If you remove the .la files, in general, it makes static libs (sometimes *very*) difficult to use(*), that's all. That's why I usually recommend to packagers that if they insist on keeping .la files, they package them separately along with the static libs. (*) In this case, the .la libxmlsec1.la contains the dependant library information, which is (usually) superluous in the shared library case, but almost always required when linking statically. Is this a duplicate of bug #154142? Basically, yeah. Fullfilling this enhancement request will effectively fix bug #154142. Okay the extra .la should have been removed some time ago, but I forgot. It should be fixed in rawhide, with the upcoming 1.2.9-7, Daniel |