Bug 171410 - xmlsec1: omit /usr/lib/lib*.la, /usr/lib/lib*.a
Summary: xmlsec1: omit /usr/lib/lib*.la, /usr/lib/lib*.a
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: xmlsec1
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Daniel Veillard
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2005-10-21 16:04 UTC by Rex Dieter
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version: 1.2.9-7
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-06-08 13:39:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Rex Dieter 2005-10-21 16:04:42 UTC
Avoid libtool madness and omit libtool archives (/usr/lib/lib*.la) and static
libs (/usr/lib/lib*.a).

See bug #154142 as an example of the problems that can be avoided.

Comment 1 Daniel Veillard 2005-10-21 16:11:53 UTC
for .la, yes for .a no, I don't see the madness

Daniel

Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2005-10-21 16:22:12 UTC
If you remove the .la files, in general, it makes static libs (sometimes *very*)
difficult to use(*), that's all.  That's why I usually recommend to packagers
that if they insist on keeping .la files, they package them separately along
with the static libs.

(*) In this case, the .la libxmlsec1.la contains the dependant library
information, which is (usually) superluous in the shared library case, but
almost always required when linking statically.

Comment 3 Kjartan Maraas 2005-11-07 20:31:03 UTC
Is this a duplicate of bug #154142?

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2005-11-07 20:37:28 UTC
Basically, yeah.  Fullfilling this enhancement request will effectively fix bug
#154142.

Comment 5 Daniel Veillard 2006-06-08 13:39:11 UTC
Okay the extra .la should have been removed some time ago, but I forgot.
It should be fixed in rawhide, with the upcoming 1.2.9-7,

Daniel


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.