Bug 171524

Summary: wakeup stopped working on ibm t43 between 1526 and 1532 kernel
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jonathan Baron <jonathanbaron7>
Component: kernelAssignee: Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4CC: wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-12-17 18:36:07 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jonathan Baron 2005-10-22 07:16:01 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20050918 Firefox/1.6a1

Description of problem:
Wakeup using mem in /sys/power/state worked in the 1526
kernel for suspend.  It takes a long time to wake up.
When I updated the kernel, it stopped working.  The suspend
sounded different, as if the disk stopped.  Wakeup was
very fast, but, after the supposed wakeup, nothing worked.
I didn't have time to search thoroughly for this bug under
all possible headings. Sorry.  I did save a big chunk of
/var/log/messages, available on request by Monday if not
before.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Didn't try

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  

Additional info:

baron.edu

Comment 1 Dave Jones 2005-11-10 19:50:26 UTC
2.6.14-1.1637_FC4 has been released as an update for FC4.
Please retest with this update, as a large amount of code has been changed in
this release, which may have fixed your problem.

Thank you.


Comment 2 Jonathan Baron 2005-11-10 20:27:08 UTC
The new 1.1637 kernel works in the T43.  Just as good as 1.1526 (although
the screen looks a little different, but it is just as fast).  Yay!
Thus, I think this particular bug should be marked fixed, but I
don't think I have the power to do that.

Comment 3 Jonathan Baron 2005-11-10 20:40:23 UTC
I spoke too soon.  After the computer resumed, and I did a few
things to test it, everything "froze" and I had to reboot.
(This may have taken a few minutes.)
I'm going to try again, but, once again, I offer to send whatever
logs might be helpful.


Comment 4 Jonathan Baron 2005-12-01 11:09:51 UTC
I think this bug MAY be a duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169201
and there is further discussion of the issue at
http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/Problems_with_SATA_and_Linux
including a patch (which I have not tried).

The only reason I think this bug may not be a duplicate is
that suspend/resume actually works for me with the
2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 kernel (which I'm still using).  According
to all these other things, it shouldn't work at all.

Comment 5 Jonathan Baron 2005-12-14 13:18:46 UTC
The 2.6.14-1.1653_FC4 kernel is a little better.  On resuming after suspend,
the computer (IBM T43) took about 30 sec to freeze up, but the pointer still
worked.  That is, it moved around on the screen, but clicking didn't do
anything.  The problem was not just X, since I could also not connect to
the computer through the wireless connection.

Comment 6 Paul W. Frields 2005-12-17 18:36:07 UTC
All of this is expected behavior for the SATA resume problem.  This bug is
indeed a duplicate of bug 169201.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 169201 ***