Bug 172062

Summary:	RFE: update libgsf to 1.13.2
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michael Wise <micwise>
Component:	libgsf	Assignee:	Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	hdegoede
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	1.13.3-1	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-11-01 09:16:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michael Wise 2005-10-30 11:39:42 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b5) Gecko/20051008 Fedora/1.5-0.5.0.beta2 Firefox/1.4.1

Description of problem:
Would it be possible to update libgsf.  I am trying to comile gnucash2. It needs libgoffice and libgoffice-0.1 needs at least libgsf-1.13.1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
libgsf-1.12.3-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  

Additional info:

Comment 1 Caolan McNamara 2005-11-01 09:16:12 UTC

Well the 1.13 series is technically "unstable", and I don't want to get into
supporting an unstable version. 1.12-3 was only released in september. I'm
reluctant to move to 1.13.

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2005-11-25 13:55:58 UTC

I would like to add a me too or +1 to this ticket, I would like to update
gnumeric in extras to 1.6 which needs libgoffice-0.1.x which needs libgsf >=
1.13.2 . Please reconcider.

Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2005-11-25 13:58:33 UTC

As an alternative I might create a libgsf13 package, whot is you opinion on that?

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2005-11-25 14:08:57 UTC

I'm not in favour of putting in a 1.13 under-development package until it's 1.14
as I don't need the pain of api changes right now for libwpd->OOo and whatever
else is lurking in the grass. A libgsf13 package sounds good

Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2005-11-26 22:41:37 UTC

In the meantime I've made a special libgsf113 package for extras which can be
installed next to the core libgsf without any problems. See bug 174266 for the
extras review. I've also created a goffice package for extras, see Bug 174267
for the review.

Comment 6 Caolan McNamara 2005-12-02 20:15:18 UTC

hmm, one of my more gung-ho co-workers has upgraded it anyway :-)

Comment 7 Hans de Goede 2005-12-05 12:57:35 UTC

Hmm,

Could you add an Obsoletes libgsf113(-devel) to it so that it get rids of
libgsf113, this doesn't conflict but ldd on something linked to libgsf might get
the extra versions as that adds /usr/lib(64)/libgsf-1.13/lib to the ldpath.

I'll update goffice and gnumeric to build against the new in core package (not
set a special PKGCONFIG path and change requires).

Thanks,

Hans

Comment 8 Caolan McNamara 2005-12-05 13:06:21 UTC

ok, done.