Bug 1721383

Summary:	RFE - IPv6 Production Support
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage	Reporter:	Gobinda Das <godas>
Component:	rhhi	Assignee:	Gobinda Das <godas>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	SATHEESARAN <sasundar>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	unspecified	CC:	dwalveka, pasik, rhs-bugs, sabose, sasundar
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	RHHI-V 1.8
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Added support to deploy Red Hat Hyperconvereged Infrastructure for Virtualization in IPV6 nodes.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-08-04 14:50:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1403677, 1688217, 1688245, 1688269, 1688271, 1688798, 1840971, 1842003
Bug Blocks:	1779976

Description Gobinda Das 2019-06-18 07:37:12 UTC

Description of problem:
 For 1.6 this feature was in Tech Preview.For 1.7 we should make this feature for production ready.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2019-12-17 07:43:38 UTC

This is a Test Only. Can we move it to ON_QA?

Comment 5 Gobinda Das 2019-12-20 06:33:04 UTC

There are few depenedent bugs related to IPv6 from cockpit side inprogress. After fix is done will change status accordingly.
I think we should not mark it as TestOnly as few fixes are required.

Comment 7 SATHEESARAN 2020-06-03 10:01:49 UTC

validation of IPV6 support is blocked on couple of bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842003

Once these bugs are fixed, this RFE could be validated

Comment 9 SATHEESARAN 2020-07-12 13:58:32 UTC

Tested with RHVH 4.4.1 and RHGS 3.5.2-async.

RHHI-V deployments are successful with static IPV6 hostname(FQDN)
Hosts are added to cluster with IPV6 hostnames.

And then the storage domains are also created with right set of mount options
required for IPV6

There is one particular bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855965 - 
where the DR feature of RHHI-V fails to sync to slave storage domain, when using
IPV6 FQDNs

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-08-04 14:50:57 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (RHHI for Virtualization 1.8 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:3314