Bug 1721383 - RFE - IPv6 Production Support
Summary: RFE - IPv6 Production Support
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: rhhi
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: RHHI-V 1.8
Assignee: Gobinda Das
QA Contact: SATHEESARAN
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1403677 1688217 1688245 1688269 1688271 1688798 1840971 1842003
Blocks: RHHI-V-1.8-Engineering-RFE-BZs
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-06-18 07:37 UTC by Gobinda Das
Modified: 2020-08-04 14:51 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Added support to deploy Red Hat Hyperconvereged Infrastructure for Virtualization in IPV6 nodes.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-04 14:50:57 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2020:3314 0 None None None 2020-08-04 14:51:19 UTC

Description Gobinda Das 2019-06-18 07:37:12 UTC
Description of problem:
 For 1.6 this feature was in Tech Preview.For 1.7 we should make this feature for production ready.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2019-12-17 07:43:38 UTC
This is a Test Only. Can we move it to ON_QA?

Comment 5 Gobinda Das 2019-12-20 06:33:04 UTC
There are few depenedent bugs related to IPv6 from cockpit side inprogress. After fix is done will change status accordingly.
I think we should not mark it as TestOnly as few fixes are required.

Comment 7 SATHEESARAN 2020-06-03 10:01:49 UTC
validation of IPV6 support is blocked on couple of bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1840971
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1842003

Once these bugs are fixed, this RFE could be validated

Comment 9 SATHEESARAN 2020-07-12 13:58:32 UTC
Tested with RHVH 4.4.1 and RHGS 3.5.2-async.

RHHI-V deployments are successful with static IPV6 hostname(FQDN)
Hosts are added to cluster with IPV6 hostnames.

And then the storage domains are also created with right set of mount options
required for IPV6

There is one particular bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855965 - 
where the DR feature of RHHI-V fails to sync to slave storage domain, when using
IPV6 FQDNs

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2020-08-04 14:50:57 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (RHHI for Virtualization 1.8 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:3314


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.