Bug 172331
Summary: | Review Request: perl-XML-DOM | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ville Skyttä <scop> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ralf Corsepius <rc040203> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-DOM/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-05 09:42:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 172330 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 128879, 163779, 170716, 172332 |
Description
Ville Skyttä
2005-11-02 21:39:59 UTC
APPROVED As with XML-RegExp, tested on FC4 only, but ... can't spot anything justifying to withhold this package. One remark: I think, I understand why this package "Obsoletes: perl-libxml-enno <= 1.02", but is this Obsoletes really necessary? FC4's perl-libxml-enno provides perl(XML::DOM) = 1.27, while this package provides perl(XML::DOM) = 1.44. Unless I'm mistaken, as perl-libxml-enno will continue to exist in FC5, when releasing a perl-libxml-enno package w/o XML-DOM removed simultaneously with this perl-XML-DOM package should suffice. Thanks, imported and built. Note that perl-libxml-enno has already been dropped from FC5 and is dead upstream; I've submitted the three packages (XML-RegExp, XML-DOM, XML-XQL) that are needed in order to not break dependencies in FE5. The full list of libxml-enno replacement CPAN distributions is in bug 128879 comment 2. |