Bug 172454

Summary:	TeXmacs conflicts with fig2ps
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Component:	TeXmacs	Assignee:	Gérard Milmeister <gemi>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4	CC:	extras-qa
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-11-15 21:34:18 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kevin Kofler 2005-11-04 19:41:01 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; H010818)

Description of problem:
TeXmacs contains a copy of fig2ps instead of depending on it (fig2ps-1.3.3-2 is in Extras). This causes the 2 packages to conflict.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install fig2ps.
2. Try to install TeXmacs.  

Actual Results:  Committing changes...
Preparing packages for installation...
	file /usr/bin/fig2ps from install of TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4 conflicts with file from package fig2ps-1.3.3-2
	file /usr/share/man/man1/fig2ps.1.gz from install of TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4 conflicts with file from package fig2ps-1.3.3-2

Expected Results:  TeXmacs should install.

Additional info:

Please have the TeXmacs specfile rm the 2 offending files and "Requires: fig2ps" instead.

Comment 1 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-04 20:17:30 UTC

Although both programs probably do the same same, they are not the same.
Is it save to use the other fig2ps?

Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2005-11-04 21:34:18 UTC

I didn't look at the source code yet. I guess we have to figure this out.

Comment 3 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-04 22:38:24 UTC

I just noticed that fig2ps (TeXmacs) used some progs that I didn't include
in the Requires, e.g. dvips and fig2dev. I presume the fig2ps has a
Requires for transfig which includes fig2dev!?
I think removing fig2ps from TeXmacs is the way to go.

Comment 4 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-15 21:34:18 UTC

Removed fig2ps from the package and added requires fig2ps.