Bug 172454
Summary: | TeXmacs conflicts with fig2ps | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Kevin Kofler <kevin> |
Component: | TeXmacs | Assignee: | Gérard Milmeister <gemi> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-15 21:34:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kevin Kofler
2005-11-04 19:41:01 UTC
Although both programs probably do the same same, they are not the same. Is it save to use the other fig2ps? I didn't look at the source code yet. I guess we have to figure this out. I just noticed that fig2ps (TeXmacs) used some progs that I didn't include in the Requires, e.g. dvips and fig2dev. I presume the fig2ps has a Requires for transfig which includes fig2dev!? I think removing fig2ps from TeXmacs is the way to go. Removed fig2ps from the package and added requires fig2ps. |