Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.
Bug 172454 - TeXmacs conflicts with fig2ps
TeXmacs conflicts with fig2ps
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: TeXmacs (Show other bugs)
4
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Gérard Milmeister
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2005-11-04 14:41 EST by Kevin Kofler
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-11-15 16:34:18 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

  None (edit)
Description Kevin Kofler 2005-11-04 14:41:01 EST 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; H010818)

Description of problem:
TeXmacs contains a copy of fig2ps instead of depending on it (fig2ps-1.3.3-2 is in Extras). This causes the 2 packages to conflict.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install fig2ps.
2. Try to install TeXmacs.  

Actual Results:  Committing changes...
Preparing packages for installation...
	file /usr/bin/fig2ps from install of TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4 conflicts with file from package fig2ps-1.3.3-2
	file /usr/share/man/man1/fig2ps.1.gz from install of TeXmacs-1.0.5.11-1.fc4 conflicts with file from package fig2ps-1.3.3-2

Expected Results:  TeXmacs should install.

Additional info:

Please have the TeXmacs specfile rm the 2 offending files and "Requires: fig2ps" instead.
Comment 1 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-04 15:17:30 EST 
Although both programs probably do the same same, they are not the same.
Is it save to use the other fig2ps?
Comment 2 Kevin Kofler 2005-11-04 16:34:18 EST 
I didn't look at the source code yet. I guess we have to figure this out.
Comment 3 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-04 17:38:24 EST 
I just noticed that fig2ps (TeXmacs) used some progs that I didn't include
in the Requires, e.g. dvips and fig2dev. I presume the fig2ps has a
Requires for transfig which includes fig2dev!?
I think removing fig2ps from TeXmacs is the way to go.
Comment 4 Gérard Milmeister 2005-11-15 16:34:18 EST 
Removed fig2ps from the package and added requires fig2ps.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
First Last Prev Next    This bug is not in your last search results.