Bug 1728673

Summary: Cannot see the "trusted.glusterfs.mdata" xattr for directory on a new brick after rebalance
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Sayalee <saraut>
Component: coreAssignee: Kotresh HR <khiremat>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Sayalee <saraut>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rhgs-3.5CC: amukherj, khiremat, moagrawa, nchilaka, ndevos, pkarampu, rgowdapp, rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal, vdas
Target Milestone: ---Flags: khiremat: needinfo-
Target Release: RHGS 3.5.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-6.0-14 Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1734026 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-30 12:22:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1696809, 1734026, 1752413, 1752429    

Description Sayalee 2019-07-10 12:06:54 UTC
Description of problem:
The "trusted.glusterfs.mdata" xattr was present on a dir on brick1 when it was created, but when added new brick (brick2) to the volume, and did rebalance as well, the xattr was not present on the dir on new brick(brick2).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.0.7

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Create a 1 brick distributed volume.
2.Mount the volume on a client node using fuse.
3.Create a dir on client node
#mkdir dir1
4.Check all the internal xattrs for the dir1 on the back-end using:
#getfattr -de hex -m . /bricks/brick1/dir1
5.Add a new brick to the volume.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 29 errata-xmlrpc 2019-10-30 12:22:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2019:3249