Bug 1732698
Summary: | The es node count in clusterlogging instance status is not correct when es nodeCount > 3. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Qiaoling Tang <qitang> |
Component: | Logging | Assignee: | Periklis Tsirakidis <periklis> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Anping Li <anli> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4.2.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, jcantril, periklis, rmeggins |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.5.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: |
Cause: Reading the wrong CR status fields to node count from elasticsearch CR.
Consequence: Incorrect node count propagated from elasticsearch status to cluster logging CR status
Fix: Use the correct field.
Result: Correct node count propagated from elasticsearch CR to cluster logging CR status.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-13 17:11:03 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Qiaoling Tang
2019-07-24 07:28:15 UTC
verified in clusterlogging.v4.5.0 logStore: elasticsearchStatus: - cluster: activePrimaryShards: 64 activeShards: 64 initializingShards: 1 numDataNodes: 4 numNodes: 4 pendingTasks: 0 relocatingShards: 0 status: yellow unassignedShards: 0 clusterName: elasticsearch nodeConditions: elasticsearch-cd-27k3wtz7-1: [] elasticsearch-cdm-ya1nz4gf-1: [] elasticsearch-cdm-ya1nz4gf-2: [] elasticsearch-cdm-ya1nz4gf-3: [] nodeCount: 4 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409 |