Bug 173374
| Summary: | xemacs is missing most icons, strange font with modular X | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand> |
| Component: | xemacs | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <scop> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | extras-qa |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i386 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 21.4.17-7.fc5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2005-12-01 11:28:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Horst H. von Brand
2005-11-16 18:35:45 UTC
Ouch, I'm afraid fixing this is going to take a while unless someone submits tested patches as I don't have a Rawhide box nor can I upgrade to one soon. Anyway, first, being unable to resolve the color names smells like something's trying to access /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb.txt while it should be trying /usr/lib/X11/rgb.txt. I grepped through the XEmacs source tree and it does seem to be doing the right thing (through fallback lists), and the error comes from a failing XLookupColor call in src/event-Xt.c. Could you try this temporarily and see if it makes any difference? # mkdir /usr/X11R6/lib/X11 # ln -s /usr/lib/X11/rgb.txt /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/ No change at all. A few more comments: Fedora rawhide has modular X, this used to work yesterday (before updating X). I've just adapted neXtaw for modular X, and it (0.15.1-7.fc5) should appear in the Extras devel repository in the next push. I doubt that it'll help much if at all per se, but at least it could allow rebuilding XEmacs again (and it would be interesting to hear if _that_ changes anything). This should be significantly improved in 21.4.17-5.fc5 (and 6.fc5 coming up soon). The edit area monospace font is still ugly though :( Popup dialog font is still wrong too. See also bug 174617. Things should be fixed in 21.4.17-7.fc5. |