Bug 1734942

Summary: arpack: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f31
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Fedora Release Engineering <releng>
Component: arpackAssignee: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 31CC: Axel.Thimm, besser82, c.david86, dominik, orion, susi.lehtola
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: arpack-3.7.0-3.fc32 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-30 18:51:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1700317, 1732841    
Attachments:
Description Flags
build.log
none
root.log
none
state.log none

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2019-07-31 17:01:10 UTC 
arpack failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f31

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36632032


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix arpack at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
arpack will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 32,
arpack will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2019-07-31 17:12:59 UTC 
Created attachment 1595392 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2019-07-31 17:13:01 UTC 
Created attachment 1595393 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2019-07-31 17:13:03 UTC 
Created attachment 1595394 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Susi Lehtola 2019-08-02 10:23:01 UTC 
*** Bug 1735460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Susi Lehtola 2019-08-02 10:30:42 UTC 
Looks like rathann is already on this
https://github.com/opencollab/arpack-ng/issues/195
Comment 6 Ben Cotton 2019-08-13 16:59:33 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle.
Changing version to '31'.
Comment 7 Ben Cotton 2019-08-13 18:35:55 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle.
Changing version to 31.
Comment 8 Orion Poplawski 2019-11-28 19:13:44 UTC 
So, the problem here is that arpack doesn't really support SYMBOLSUFFIX to change the BLAS/LAPACK symbol names, so the current ILP64 build is using a mix of ILP64 configured arpack and 32-bit BLAS routines.  I'm working on a couple options for fixing this.

Easiest to do is to switch to using the non-symbol suffixed version of openblas, which I think we should rename to "arpack64" instead of "arpack64_".  PR filed here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpack/pull-request/1

I'm still poking at trying to support a symbol suffixed version.