Hide Forgot
arpack failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f31 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36632032 For details on the mass rebuild see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Please fix arpack at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks, arpack will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 32, arpack will be retired, if it still fails to build. For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source
Created attachment 1595392 [details] build.log file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1595393 [details] root.log file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Created attachment 1595394 [details] state.log
*** Bug 1735460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Looks like rathann is already on this https://github.com/opencollab/arpack-ng/issues/195
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to '31'.
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 31 development cycle. Changing version to 31.
So, the problem here is that arpack doesn't really support SYMBOLSUFFIX to change the BLAS/LAPACK symbol names, so the current ILP64 build is using a mix of ILP64 configured arpack and 32-bit BLAS routines. I'm working on a couple options for fixing this. Easiest to do is to switch to using the non-symbol suffixed version of openblas, which I think we should rename to "arpack64" instead of "arpack64_". PR filed here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/arpack/pull-request/1 I'm still poking at trying to support a symbol suffixed version.