Bug 1738420

Summary: some options are missing in snmptrapd man page in Japanese
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: masanari iida <masanari.iida>
Component: man-pages-jaAssignee: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: QE Internationalization Bugs <qe-i18n-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.7CC: bbarve, eng-i18n-bugs, mfabian, pnemade
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: i18n
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: man-pages-ja-20130615-6.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-31 20:03:59 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description masanari iida 2019-08-07 06:52:55 UTC 
Description of problem:
There are 3 types of problems in japanese version of snmptrapd man page.
(1)Some options are missing in snmptrapd man page in Japanese.
(2)-p option in Japanese man page is not same as the its of English page.
(3)Command options are listed not alphabet order in Japanese man page.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
man-pages-ja-20130615-5.el7.noarch

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Login to the system
2. export LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
3. man snmptrapd

Actual results:
(1) Missing options in Japanese man pages.
-f, -h, -H, -L, -m, -M,-O, -p, -t, -x, --name

(2) Some options in Japanese man page is not same as the its of English page. 
-p 
Japanese: デフォルトの 162 番ポートで実行したくない場合に、 実行させるポートを指定する。
English: Save the process ID of the trap daemon in FILE.
Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-03-31 20:03:59 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:1125