Bug 174245
Summary: | directfb upgrade breaks livna packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alex Lancaster <alex> |
Component: | directfb | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | extras-qa |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-11-27 18:22:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Alex Lancaster
2005-11-26 12:55:35 UTC
More breakage, just FYI for tracking: http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669 http://bugzilla.livna.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670 Changing severity to "enhancement", because it is really an enhancement in the package process. Hmm, I know livna would need some package rebuilds but I didn't expect a breakage in between, to solve stuff like this extras keeps older versions of lib packages around. You could have worked around this by just adding --exclude=directfb to your yum update cmdline. And you can fix things by reinstalling the still available old directfb and use --exclude=directfb untill livna is in sync. Anyways sorry for the inconvience closing as not a bug, since this is not a bug. If its a bug anywhere its a bug in smart. yum did the right thing iow asked the user to fix it, although some kinda interactive fix mode which would allow the user to choose between the smart way or the yum --exclude way would be nice. p.s. My previous statement may sound a bit more harsh then intended I will do my best with future updates to notify livna in advance, that is ifcourse a very reasonable request. (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, > > I know livna would need some package rebuilds but I didn't expect a breakage in > between, to solve stuff like this extras keeps older versions of lib packages > around. > > You could have worked around this by just adding --exclude=directfb to your yum > update cmdline. I am aware of all those workarounds. My point in opening a bug was to raise awareness of the inter-repository rebuilds and co-ordination issues. The mailing list posts on fedora-extras-list also help that. In general it's probably a good idea for packages which livna depends on to be better co-ordinated between FE and livna for library upgrades which change the lib*.so dependencies. PS. This also pertains for Core and Extra upgrades (e.g. mozilla updates from Core constantly break galeon in Extras). |