Bug 1750580

Summary:	Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Artem <ego.cordatus>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	eclipseo, package-review
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-09-28 23:32:10 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1750590

Description Artem 2019-09-09 23:33:15 UTC

Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass-3.0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
This library allows you to write entries to a KeePass database.

Fedora Account System Username: atim

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-19 16:18:20 UTC

 - GPL3 is not a valid license shourthand, it should be:

License:        GPLv3

 - Use %{pypi_source}

Source0:        %{pypi_source}


I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959

However the reporter needs to be sponsored.

Comment 2 Artem 2019-09-19 16:37:38 UTC

> I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959

Yep, i apologize, this a second time when i noticed this only after i already did my own build. :( I wanted this Password Safe in repos for a long time and when i am first time tried to package it was required many python packages and i postponed it.

I am always happy for co-maintanership so if original poster wish i am up, or vise versa.

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-22 15:46:01 UTC

(In reply to Artem from comment #2)
> > I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959
> 
> Yep, i apologize, this a second time when i noticed this only after i
> already did my own build. :( I wanted this Password Safe in repos for a long
> time and when i am first time tried to package it was required many python
> packages and i postponed it.
> 
> I am always happy for co-maintanership so if original poster wish i am up,
> or vise versa.

You would need to contact him for that, he hasn't shown interest in doing sample reviews to be sponsored though.

See also his bug report for passwordsafe: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718339

I'll see if I can sponsor him.

Comment 4 Artem 2019-09-28 23:32:10 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1719959 ***