Bug 1750580 - Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases
Summary: Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass da...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1719959
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1750590
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-09-09 23:33 UTC by Artem
Modified: 2019-09-28 23:32 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-09-28 23:32:10 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Artem 2019-09-09 23:33:15 UTC
Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass.spec
SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass-3.0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm

Description:
This library allows you to write entries to a KeePass database.

Fedora Account System Username: atim

Comment 1 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-19 16:18:20 UTC
 - GPL3 is not a valid license shourthand, it should be:

License:        GPLv3

 - Use %{pypi_source}

Source0:        %{pypi_source}


I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959

However the reporter needs to be sponsored.

Comment 2 Artem 2019-09-19 16:37:38 UTC
> I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959

Yep, i apologize, this a second time when i noticed this only after i already did my own build. :( I wanted this Password Safe in repos for a long time and when i am first time tried to package it was required many python packages and i postponed it.

I am always happy for co-maintanership so if original poster wish i am up, or vise versa.

Comment 3 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2019-09-22 15:46:01 UTC
(In reply to Artem from comment #2)
> > I've already reviewed this and approved it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719959
> 
> Yep, i apologize, this a second time when i noticed this only after i
> already did my own build. :( I wanted this Password Safe in repos for a long
> time and when i am first time tried to package it was required many python
> packages and i postponed it.
> 
> I am always happy for co-maintanership so if original poster wish i am up,
> or vise versa.

You would need to contact him for that, he hasn't shown interest in doing sample reviews to be sponsored though.

See also his bug report for passwordsafe: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1718339

I'll see if I can sponsor him.

Comment 4 Artem 2019-09-28 23:32:10 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1719959 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.