Bug 1754129

Summary:	gdeploy fails to install in Fedora rawhide (requires PyYAML)
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component:	gdeploy	Assignee:	Sachidananda Urs <sacchi>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	32	CC:	ramkrsna, sacchi
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-05-11 06:58:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1750909

Description Miro Hrončok 2019-09-20 22:55:33 UTC

gdeploy-2.0.8-3.fc29.noarch fails to install in Fedora rawhide:

  nothing provides PyYAML needed by gdeploy-2.0.8-3.fc29.noarch

This is caused by using the unversioned Python name.

Please either depend on python3-pyyaml or python2-pyyaml explicitly. Thanks

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2019-10-03 21:33:27 UTC

Error: 
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides PyYAML needed by gdeploy-3.0.0-2.noarch

Comment 2 Sachidananda Urs 2019-10-04 03:48:43 UTC

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> Error: 
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides PyYAML needed by gdeploy-3.0.0-2.noarch

Ack. I will fix this and do a rebuild. Thanks.

Comment 3 Sachidananda Urs 2019-10-05 03:56:39 UTC

(In reply to Sachidananda Urs from comment #2)
> (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1)
> > Error: 
> >  Problem: conflicting requests
> >   - nothing provides PyYAML needed by gdeploy-3.0.0-2.noarch
> 
> Ack. I will fix this and do a rebuild. Thanks.

I have made a new build changing the package name to python3-pyyaml

Comment 4 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:53:20 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 5 Igor Raits 2020-05-11 06:58:53 UTC

Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain).

All subpackages of a package agaisnt which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 32.

Thanks for taking care of it!