Bug 1755035

Summary:	[RFE] EPEL8 branch of python-paramiko
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora EPEL	Reporter:	Pat Riehecky <riehecky>
Component:	python-paramiko	Assignee:	Paul Howarth <paul>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	epel8	CC:	agrimm, athmanem, gwync, igor.raits, ivazqueznet, orion, paul, pcahyna, rebus, sgallagh
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	python-paramiko-2.4.3-1.el8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-10-27 00:12:26 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1755117
Bug Blocks:	1744975

Description Pat Riehecky 2019-09-24 15:10:53 UTC

Description of problem:

Can pyhton-paramiko be branched for EPEL8?  This is required for ansible.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Orion Poplawski 2019-09-24 16:23:52 UTC

I'll just note that it is interesting that ansible from the ansible-2.8-for-rhel-8-x86_64-rpms repository does not require python-paramiko.  ansible can certainly use it, but it is not strictly required.

Comment 2 Paul Howarth 2019-09-24 18:30:41 UTC

I can do this but:

1. It will be paramiko 2.4.3 because 2.5.0 and above require python-cryptography 2.5 or later and EL-8 has python-cryptography 2.3.
2. It will be Python 3 only; even if I wanted to build for Python 2 (which I don't), the necessary dependencies aren't available.

Will that be OK for you?

Comment 3 Pat Riehecky 2019-09-24 18:37:13 UTC

All of that seems fine to me.

Comment 4 Paul Howarth 2019-09-24 18:43:34 UTC

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/17189
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/17190

Comment 5 Paul Howarth 2019-09-24 19:36:37 UTC

Well it looks like python-pynacl isn't available, though it was in the EL8 beta.

I've requested a branch of that for EPEL now.

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2019-10-11 15:26:08 UTC

FEDORA-EPEL-2019-88c40ed38a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-88c40ed38a

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2019-10-11 23:27:44 UTC

python-paramiko-2.4.3-1.el8, python-pynacl-1.3.0-5.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-88c40ed38a

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2019-10-27 00:12:26 UTC

python-paramiko-2.4.3-1.el8, python-pynacl-1.3.0-5.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.